apt lorg3 on RH9

[Ralf Corsepius]

On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 18:14 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 15:31 +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:

> > This seems to be epoch related, however it doesn't concern an undefined 
> > epoch afaics. This is what is installed:
> 
> Sigh. Oh well, I certainly did expect epoch breakage on older RH's. The
> repomd data is fedora.us all over again: it stomps zero epochs on every
> package, versioned dependency and provides regardless if the epoch
> actually is defined as zero or doesn't exist.

Can you explain why apt doesn't do the same?

Ralf