[Apt-Rpm] What is the best choice for RPM Update Tool

Quan phongvan phongvan84 at gmail.com
Wed Jan 9 01:28:38 PST 2008


Thanks Ralf,
Maybe I made an mistake here, I've want to mention about that yum has a huge
developer resource behind it, and yum has leased the stable version compare
to testing version of apt and smart.
In addition, because of my target machine run on embedded RTOS Linux (CentOS
for demonstrating purpose only) so I hope to get your advices more specified
on embedded systems run on Linux using rpm packages system (hereunder RHEL
base).
Thank you,
Best regards,
Nguyen Anh Quan.

On Jan 9, 2008 3:43 PM, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> wrote:

>
> On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 14:41 +0700, Quan phongvan wrote:
> > Again I really appreciate your advices.
> > As I mentioned above, CentOS 4.5 is not really my target machine to
> > run on my project but MFP that requires run on RTOS like embedded
> > Linux (for example VxWorks). From a business POV as you recommended
> > and from my study, it is so attractive of the fact that yum has a huge
> > support from rpm community,
> That's a mis-perception/mis-interpretation
>
> yum is RH's and Fedora's native installer and as such received support
> from RH and Fedora developers - That's essentially all.
>
> In particular, yum is not directly connected to rpm's development,
> except that there are some intersections in the persons being involved
> (in particular Panu).
>
> Other distros don't use yum (e.g. SuSE/Novell) or use different
> variants/version of rpm than RH does.
>
> >  maybe it it the strongest candidate for vendor business. But is there
> > any advance of apt to beat yum in using on embedded Linux as a rpm
> > package update tools such as: speed, smart dependency resolving,
> > mini-ram machine, easy to handle rpm packages, security.
> Is this meant to be a question?
>
> I think, Axel already answered this in a previous posting. So ... yes
> there are quite a number of technical advantages of apt-rpm over yum.
>
> Should you consider to run apt on an embedded target, then yum would not
> be an option to me.
>
> Ralf
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Apt-Rpm mailing list
> Apt-Rpm at lists.laiskiainen.org
> http://lists.laiskiainen.org/listinfo.cgi/apt-rpm-laiskiainen.org
>



-- 
Never walk alone
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.laiskiainen.org/pipermail/apt-rpm-laiskiainen.org/attachments/20080109/24868b30/attachment-0001.htm 


More information about the Apt-Rpm mailing list