apt-0.5.15lorg3.1-rc2

Axel Thimm Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Wed May 17 03:37:33 PDT 2006


On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 07:40:57PM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> > I'd change the package name (e.g. apt-rpm instead of apt), and start all
> > over with an "all numeric" version numbering.
> 
> Yeah, the new numbering will be all numeric certainly, and apt ->
> apt-rpm makes a lot of sense as well, I suppose that can be considered
> as agreed on now.

Would that also mean that apt as a command will be renamed to apt-rpm?
for example

apt-rpm install foo

> I'm mostly wondering about the actual version where to jump to, 1.0
> sounds a bit high considering various things but then .. it's just a
> damn number.

1.0 sounds fine. :=)
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.laiskiainen.org/pipermail/apt-rpm-laiskiainen.org/attachments/20060517/10aad6c4/attachment-0003.pgp>


More information about the Apt-Rpm mailing list